An approximation of energy poverty in Peru: contributions for the Loreto Region
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15648/Collectivus.vol10num1.2023.3569Keywords:
Energy poverty, gender, socio-environmental, multi-scalarity, territory, Multidimensional Energy Poverty IndexAbstract
The main objective of this research is to outline an exploratory study that identifies the levels of energy poverty in Peru, with emphasis on the Loreto region, which according to the results of this study represents the highest rate of energy poverty. While the specific objective seeks to make a analysis of energy poverty with a focus on gender and socio-environmental issues.
Energy poverty must be understood with a multidimensional approach (Sovacool, 2014) considering socioeconomic, environmental and behavioral factors (Fernández, 2019). For this, the MEPI structure was used using data from the National Household Survey published by the National Institute of Statistics and Informatics of Peru.
The results show that the MEPI at the national level has progressively decreased from 0,21 in 2010 to 0,09 in 2019. Loreto is the department with the least progress, registering the highest level of energy poverty in 2019 (0,30). This situation has slowed down all kinds of social development, magnifying existing inequalities, such as those related to gender, and socio-environmental.
It is concluded that there is no conceptual and methodological framework for the Peruvian context in terms of energy poverty. The results obtained within the MEPI methodology must be contextualised under the multi-scalar and territorial perspective. In this sense, the contribution of the research lies in identifying that the MEPI methodology should be improved for Latin American contexts, where the territorial perspective and multi-scalarity are transversal elements for a more precise measurement in terms of dimensions and variables that respond to fundamental energy needs and basic.
Author Biographies
Urphy Vásquez Baca, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Magíster en Gestión y Política de la Innovación y la Tecnología de la Escuela de Posgrado de la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. Departamento de Ingeniería PUCP. Lima 32. urphy.vasquez@pucp.edu.pe
Cecilia del Pilar Fernández Canchos, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Magíster en Ciencias de Economía y Política de la Energía y el Medioambiente de la University College London. TINKUY-PUCP. Lima 32. ceciliafernandezc@gmail.com
Patricia Magaly Barros Pozo, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Magíster en Planificación Territorial y Gestión Ambiental de la Universidad de Barcelona. TINKUY-PUCP. Lima 32. patba86@gmail.com
References
Calvo, R., Álamos, N., Billi, M., Urquiza, A., y Contreras Lisperguer, R. (2021). Desarrollo de indicadores de pobreza energética en América Latina y el Caribe. Serie Recursos Naturales y Desarrollo, N° 207. Santiago. Recuperado de https://repositorio.cepal.org/bitstream/handle/11362/47216/4/S2100433_es.pdf
Castelao Caruana, M. E., & Méndez, F. M. (2019). La pobreza energética desde una perspectiva de género en hogares urbanos de Argentina. SaberEs (online), 11(2), 133–151. Recuperado de http://www.scielo.org.ar/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1852-42222019000200003&lng=es&nrm=iso#notas
Clancy, J; Ummar, F.; Shakya, I.; Kelkar, G. (2007). Appropriate Gender-Analysis Tools for Unpacking the Gender-Energy-Poverty Nexus. Gender and Development, 15(2), 241–257. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20461204.
Dourojeanni, M. (2013). Loreto Sostenible al 2021. Derecho, Ambiente y Recursos Naturales (DAR). Recuperado de https://dar.org.pe/archivos/publicacion/lsostenible2021_p2.pdf
Fernández, C. (2019). Measuring the level of Energy Poverty using Multidimensional Energy Poverty Index: empirical evidence from households in Peru, 2006-2016. International Association for Energy Economics (IAEE). Recuperado de https://www.iaee.org/proceedings/article/15978
García-Ochoa, R. (2014). Pobreza energética en América Latina. Santiago de Chile: Naciones Unidas.
García-Ochoa, R. y Graizbord, B. (2016). Caracterización espacial de la pobreza energética en México. Un análisis a escala subnacional. Economía, Sociedad y Territorio, 16(51), 289-337.
Gonzales, P. (2018). Gender inequality and energy poverty: A forgotten risk factor. Engineering Without Borders groups of Energy and Extractive Industries and Gender. Recuperado de: https://esf-cat.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/ESFeres17-PobresaEnergeticaiDesigualtatdeGenere-ENG.pdf
Groh, S. (2014) ‘The role of energy in development processes - The energy poverty penalty: Case study of Arequipa (Peru)’, Energy for Sustainable Development. International Energy Initiative. Publicado por Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved., 18(1), pp. 83–99. Recuperado de: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2013.12.002.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2021). Climate change 2021: The physical science basis. En V. Masson-Delmotte, P. Zhai, A. Pirani, S. L. Connors, C. Péan, S. Berger, … B. Zhou (Eds.), Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (p. 39). Recuperado de https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/downloads/report/IPCC_AR6_WGI_SPM_final.pdf
Ministerio de Energía y Minas. (2021). Balance nacional de energía 2019. Lima, Perú. Recuperado de https://www.gob.pe/institucion/minem/informes-publicaciones/1902937-balance-nacional-de-energia-2019
Mutschler, M. H. (2009). Matriz energética en el perú y contribución de las energías renovables. Friedrich Ebert Stiftung.
Naciones Unidas (2013). 2012: The International Year of Sustainable Energy for All. Recuperado de: http://www.se4all.org/sites/default/files/l/2013/09/YearofSE4All.pdf.
Nguyen, C.P; Su, T.D. (2021). Does energy poverty matter for gender inequality? Global evidence. Energy for Sustainable Development. Volume 64, Pages 35-45, ISSN 0973-0826, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2021.07.003.Nussbaumer, P., Bazilian, M. y Modi, V. (2012). Measuring energy poverty: Focusing on what matters. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. Elsevier Ltd, 16(1), pp. 231–243. Recuperado de http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.07.150
Nussbaumer, P., Nerini, F. F., Onyeji, I. y Howells, M. (2013). Global Insights Based on the Multidimensional Energy Poverty Index (MEPI), MDPI, (i), pp. 2060–2076. doi: 10.3390/su5052060. Recuperado de: https://doi.org/10.3390/su5052060
Pachauri, S.; Rao, N. (2013). Gender impacts and determinants of energy poverty: Are we asking the right questions? Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, Volume 5, Issue 2, June 2013, Pages 205-215.
Rodríguez, A.; De la Cruz, R.; Salazar, C.; Coello, Francisco; Muñoz, J. y D. Carcausto (2018). Acceso a la energía en poblaciones vulnerables. Documento de Trabajo N° 44, Gerencia de Políticas y Análisis Económico - Osinergmin, Perú.
Scott, F., & Elzinga, D. (s/f). El papel de los combustibles fósiles en un sistema energético sostenible. Naciones Unidas. Recuperado el 18 de agosto de 2022, de https://www.un.org/es/chronicle/article/el-papel-de-los-combustibles-fosiles-en-un-sistema-energetico-sostenible
Sovacool, B. K. (2014). Defining, Measuring, and Tackling Energy Poverty. En Energy Poverty: Global Challenges and Local Solutions. Oxford Academic, pp. 21–53. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199682362.003.0003
Yadoo, A. and Cruickshank, H. (2012) ‘The role for low carbon electrification technologies in poverty reduction and climate change strategies: A focus on renewable energy mini-grids with case studies in Nepal, Peru and Kenya’, Energy Policy. Elsevier, 42, pp. 591–602. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.12.029








.jpg)










